It took an Istanbul court a matter of hours to issue – with no explanation – a seizure order for Turkey′s most popular newspaper Zaman and appoint trustees to run it. The decision was made under Turkey′s anti-terror laws that allow any company or property to be seized merely on the suspicion of supporting terrorism.
″It was only a matter of time, it was expected but it is still heartbreaking and overwhelming,″ declared Sevgi Akarcesme, editor of Today′s Zaman, the publication's English sister paper, which was also seized. ″All authoritarian governments use the same tactics and tools. To silence opposition and media they cite terrorism charges: what this government is doing is no different.″
The Zaman papers are linked to the Islamic cleric Fethullah Gulen, one time ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his ruling AK party, but now a bitter rival. The rivalry went public in December 2014 in an explosive way when police and prosecutors exposed massive high-level corruption implicating family members of senior ministers and the president.
″Extension of a secret body″
President Erdogan contends it was an attempted coup by followers of Gulen, who lives in self-imposed exile in the United States. ″It is a complex network, which in fact, is not media, but an extension of a secret body,″ wrote columnist Saadet Oruc in defence of Zaman′s seizure in the pro-government Sabah newspaper. Gulen followers have now been proscribed by state prosecutors as the Fethullah Terrorist Organisation (FETO).
Cumhuriyet′s editor Can Dundar and his Ankara bureau chief Erdem Gul face 35 years in jail for an article alleging the government were supplying weapons to radical Islamists in Syria. Their prosecutions followed the personal intervention of Erdogan, who warned they would be punished severely. Following those words, prosecutors duly indicted the journalists.
But in an increasingly rare act of independence, the Constitutional Court intervened and declared the case violated freedom of expression. The men were released from pre-trial detention, but their case is due to resume later this month. In a message that was widely seen to be aimed at the court, Erdogan defiantly declared about the Constitutional Court ruling, ″I don′t obey the decision. I don′t respect it either.″
″Trajectory towards authoritarianism″
Prosecutors are also increasingly using the law forbidding insults against the president to silence critical reporting. Nearly 2000 cases have been filed, with many aimed at the public, including school children. Journalists remain the main target, however. ″All the developments of the last months show that Turkey is on a trajectory towards authoritarianism,″ declared Emma Sinclair-Webb, Turkey′s chief researcher with the US-based organisation Human Rights Watch. ″Basically Erdogan and the AKP want to get rid of all the checks on the power of the executive.″
With much of mainstream media under government control or cowed by ″self censorship″, there has been an explosion in alternative media sites, along with social media. ″Mediascope″ has become a popular political discussion programme on the net, with many journalists and writers contributing who have lost favour with the government and thus disappeared from mainstream media. But even in cyberspace, there is increasingly little protection.
Through a combination of threats and cajoling, the government has successfully had more tweets removed than any other country. Next to China and Iran, Turkey has also had the most media sites banned. Political columnist Kadri Gursel, once a leading columnist for one of Turkey′ s leading newspaper Milliyet until a tweet he wrote upset the president, says the situation cannot continue, ″If it goes on, Turkey will be unsustainable, this is the logic of the dynamic. Turkey will descend into chaos.″
Whether at home or abroad, there are few checks to the government, which has been emboldened its victory in last November′s general election victory and its current pivotal role in stemming the refugee crisis.
The seizure of Zaman was predicted by a notorious informer within the president′s circles, known by the nom de guerre Fuat Avni. Avni tweeted just days before that Erdogan had personally demanded the paper′s seizure.
Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu hit back in a press conference, insisting it was a "legal, not political act,″ and adding ″it is out of the question for either me or any of my colleagues to interfere in this process.″ But his argument was somewhat undermined by the remarkable transformation of Zaman following its seizure.
Within 48 hours the paper had turned from ardent critic to supporter of the president, with a front page of Erdogan in praise of his pet project – a third bridge over the Bosphorus. Bugun newspaper and KanalTurk TV station, both with links to Gulen, underwent similar transformations following their seizure last October.
Relentless policy of intimidation
The speed and what is widely seen as the arbitrary nature of the seizure of Zaman, is also seen as sending a powerful message to the few remaining independent media. ″There are one or two independent media left,″ observes political scientist Cengiz Aktar of Istanbul′ s Suleyman Sah University, ″but they are under intense pressure from the government, judging by the jailing of the editor-in-chief of Cumhuriyet. He spent 3 months in jail and the pressure has not let up since his release.″
European Union leaders are desperately courting their Turkish counterparts. Turkey′s EU membership bid, once confined to the deep freeze, is back on the agenda, ″It′s just ridiculous to talk about the accession of such a country to the European Union, it′s a joke,″ an exasperated Aktar declares.
Such is the confidence of Ankara, the seizure of Zaman took place just days before a summit with EU leaders to discuss resolving the crisis. While the Council of Europe slammed the seizure, reaction from the EU was muted. ″I think the EU has betrayed its own principles,″ observed international relations expert Soli Ozel of Istanbul′s Kadir Has University grimly. ″The refugee crisis has basically shown that when expediency demands it, hypocrisy is the rule and commitment to principles is rather the exception. We are on our own and will have to take care of our own problems.″
In reference to the EU′s response, Akarcesme, now in hiding, declares, ″It′s a huge disappointment. I don′t know who is going to take the Europeans seriously now when they talk about values.″ For her and her colleagues, she admits the future is less than certain, ″All top editors are now at risk of being arbitrarily arrested.″
Published on Qantara.de, 11 March 2016, Friday