A high criminal court in Adana has accepted an indictment against nine police officers who were arrested and later released in April as part of an investigation into claims of illegal wiretapping that is seen by many as a politically motivated witch hunt.
The document seeks up to 47 years in prison for each of the officers.
On Monday the Adana 8th High Criminal Court accepted the 41-page indictment, which charges the police officers with several offenses, including conducting illegal wiretaps, forging official documents, violating privacy in communication, invasion of privacy and storing personal information.
The prosecutors who prepared the indictment asked the court to issue arrest warrants for the police officers.
On April 8 nine police officers were detained in the southern province of Adana as part of an investigation into allegations of illegal wiretapping that were based on reports in government newspapers. Six of the officers were later arrested on charges of conducting illegal wiretaps.
The arrested officers, including police chiefs İsmail Bilgin and Ertuğrul Yetkin, were released on April 14. The officers have denied that they were involved in illegal wiretaps.
The investigation into the nine police officers is being carried out by Adana Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Ali Doğan. The investigation drew strong criticism, as they were based on claims made in government media outlets' news reports. This raised suspicions as to whether the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) had kicked off a witch hunt against the Hizmet movement, which the prime minister recently threatened to “punish with a large-scale operation.” There has been increased chatter in the Turkish capital about whether the government may soon launch a probe in a bid to intimidate its opponents, especially people and companies affiliated with the Hizmet movement.
The indictment against the nine police officers was sent to the Adana court on April 21.
In the indictment Doğan argued that no official body or individual had asked the police officers to wiretap people's conversations. “The fact that the illegal wiretaps were carried out by members of the police force has weakened people's confidence in the state of rule of law,” the deputy chief prosecutor said in the document.
The indictment also quoted Aytaç Akyol, one of the nine police officers, as saying that intelligence obtained via wiretaps of certain individuals had revealed a plot to assassinate Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in 2012. The plot was foiled thanks to the intelligence gathered via the wiretap, according to the indictment.
On Tuesday the lawyer for police chiefs Bilgin and Yetkin filed criminal complaints against Doğan at the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK), arguing that Doğan had abused his authority and caused financial and psychological damages to the police chiefs. The police chiefs are demanding Doğan pay TL 100,000 in damages to each.
In another worrying sign of impartiality among members of the judiciary, a judge who ordered the arrest of six police officers in early April made headlines in Turkey after his strong support for Prime Minister Erdoğan became apparent.
Several news outlets published a number of Facebook posts by the judge, İbrahim Sağır, in which he expressed his close affinity with the prime minister.
On March 28 the judge wrote, “We love you R.T. Erdoğan because those who don't love you don't love this nation either. Because Zionist Israel and its collaborators don't love you. Because all oppressed people and Muslims in the world love you. Because you are of this nation. May God protect you and help you succeed. For all of our sakes. Amen.”
In a Facebook post on March 30, the judge celebrated the victory of Erdoğan's AK Party in the local elections held that day. “Yes friends, the real winner is the great Turkish nation. And the loser is Israel, the neocons and their collaborators here [in Turkey].” The AK Party won a clear victory at the ballot box on March 30, garnering 43 percent of the vote.
The judge's posts have cast grave doubt on his impartiality in ordering the arrests of the police officers in Adana.
Sağır has also expressed his dislike of Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen and the Hizmet movement in his Facebook posts. In a post on April 1, the judge wrote: “One day, a young man came and presented a petition to me. I asked him what his petition was about. He said he wanted to change his name. I checked his name. It was Fethullah. I asked the man why he wanted to change his name. He said he doesn't want to share a name with that traitor [referring to Fethullah Gülen]. At first I felt sorry. Then I admired the man's sensitivity.”
Published on Cihan, 06 May 2014, Tuesday
Related Articles
Latest news, academic excerpts, commentary, book reviews and interviews on Fethullah Gulen and the Hizmet Movement (aka The Gulen Movement).
Search This Blog
Overview
Content from 164 countries/states
Categories
New Audio Podcast
Some Highlights
- Top Three Reasons Why Turkey’s President Erdogan is Obsessed with Gulen
- Turkish witch-hunt against the Gulen movement lacks one thing: Evidence
- Bill Clinton on Fethullah Gulen's contribution to the world
- Erdoğan’s war against Hizmet: Step by step
- Is Gulen Movement a religious order?
- Is the Gülen Movement a civil society initiative?
- Popular Islam – Hizmet-Gülen Movement and Fethullah Gülen
- Why do they lie about Fethullah Gülen?
- The Responsibility of the Hizmet movement
- Gülen movement is a chance for humanity, American professor says
- Gulen Movement: An attempt to represent Islam and Muslims positively
- Muslims Must Combat the Extremist Cancer
- The Place of the Gulen Movement in the intellectual history of Islam
- A Universal Islamic Phenomenon in Turkish Religious Practice: the Gülen Case
Suggested Readings
Disclaimer: Copyrights and ideas in the articles belong to their respective owners. Hizmet Movement (Gulen Movement) Blog may not be held liable from the content of articles nor their potential misuse by third parties. Articles shared are not necessarily endorsed. Links and images used in the blog posts may differ from those at their original source. Translated articles are solely intended for the convenience of the readers, and may include minor errors.